Security for Power System Operations

 

 

EPRI Report - Remote Monitoring of Physical Security for Substations

The need for physical security of substations is becoming more urgent as power systems are operated closer to their limits, as information systems become increasingly important to power system operations, and as sophisticated substation equipment becomes more vulnerable to physical threats due not only to deliberate attacks but also to inadvertent mistakes, failures, and natural catastrophes.

This requirement for physical security affects all substation assets to one degree or another. The key is the tradeoff between the costs (monetary and some reduced efficiency) of implementing security measures and the probabilistic benefits associated with avoided costs (monetary, social, political, and legal). There is no direct monetary return from security measures. Also, this tradeoff has no single answer and no single solution, and certainly one size does not fit all. However, remote monitoring of assets can bring benefits both by increased security and by decreased costs in implementing security measures. These include:

  • Synergies between primary system monitoring and security monitoring. Health and operational data from the primary system equipment and the communications system devices can provide significant security information. Vice versa, security equipment such as video cameras and heat sensors can provide maintenance information.

  • Economies of scale in combining system monitoring. As a result of these synergies, combining the remote monitoring of the three systems: the primary power system, the secondary communications system, and the systems used for physical security, can increase the reliability and effectiveness of all three, while also minimizing the direct costs associated with implementing the security measures.

  • Security solutions can be enhanced by increased monitoring. One critical substation might warrant electronic locks on the gates, while a less important one remains with padlocks. However, if that less important substation is “almost” critical or might become critical under certain conditions, additional security monitoring could be added, such as a “gate-open-status” sensor for alarming the operator.

The objective of this report was to assess the benefits of including remote monitoring with the various security technologies used for providing physical security to substation facilities and equipment. This remote monitoring provides near-real-time security information on the access points to substation facilities as well as the status and health of equipment to determine if the equipment has been tampered with or is otherwise not functioning correctly. The types of security technologies include locks at gates and doors, video/audio surveillance, motion detection, infrared detectors, vibration sensors, pressure sensors, and other methods for deterring, delaying, assessing, communicating, and responding to potential security threats. In addition, power system equipment and communications equipment provide equipment “health” and “tampering” information that could be used to determine if anomalous events, either deliberate or inadvertent, have occurred. These technologies also provide detailed logs of these events for forensic audits and legal analysis.

EPRI Report - Security Risk Assessment for TVA

The Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) has recently placed a new 161 kV switching station into service in Tiptonville, Tennessee. Internally, this facility uses a state-of-the-art communications infrastructure based on networked communications (i.e. a fiber optic Ethernet LAN) and the Utility Communications Architecture (UCA™). Interconnecting a complement of ‘smart’ devices and subsystems in the control house and switchyard, it provides a flexible and timely means to exchange data and perform control, supporting all SCADA and protection applications in an open (i.e. non-proprietary) environment.

TVA is currently implementing the Bradley Substation using IEC 61850 for all protective relaying communications, and for many other devices. This intelligent equipment has the potential to provide significant amounts of information to enterprise users and systems, but a viable, secure Wide Area Network communications infrastructure for TVA’s operational business environment is required. Until this is realized, the real promise of substation automation and enterprise access at TVA will remain unfulfilled.

To combat this limitation and to take advantage of current and emerging information technology within the transmission system, the Transmission / Power Supply Group within TVA has conceived a plan to build a Wide Area Network capability called PowerWAN. PowerWAN will be a real-time operating network, constituting a separate security perimeter within TVA. The PowerWAN goal is to provide secure, reliable access to information from transmission assets, making it available to enterprise users and systems. It will use both private (TVA) and public infrastructure as it is deployed across TVA’s 80,000 square mile service territory. The first phase of the project, currently under way, focuses on the backbone network infrastructure and tie points to other TVA networks, where the end users and systems reside.  These users and systems will be enabled by PowerWAN to meet the increasing demands brought about by a competitive market.

For TVA and other utilities, these increasing demands can be seen as opportunities, not headaches: opportunities, through automation, to improve maintenance productivity, to minimize the number and severity of equipment failures, to utilize the power system more efficiently while not exceeding critical limits, to minimize the cost and time for implementing new substations, and to provide high-quality power to customers. Along with these opportunities, however, comes the challenge of cyber security, since the sources of much of this data are devices and systems that are critical to the operation of the power system.

Cyber security has undoubtedly become a major issue for almost all electric utilities. This is partly due to the competitive environment, where crucial information (gathered legally or illegally) can translate into millions of dollars, but mainly due to the increased vulnerability brought about by the integration of networking technologies within the systems and equipment used on the power system. This threat is even more credible, because of the terrorist attacks on September 11th.  It is particularly true for the United States that a loss of electrical power for any extended time and over a large area can have serious consequences for the economy, for the safety of people, and for the legal and financial status of the utilities affected.

PowerWAN will be a vital part of TVA’s future. Physical infrastructure alone is not enough to meet the challenge. To be successful, sound security policy, practices, and procedures must be developed. 

 

EPRI Report - Scoping Study on Security Policies and Secure Communications Alternatives

Xanthus staff, as a part of EPRI’s Electric Infrastructure Security (EIS) program, is undertaking a scoping study on security policies and secure communication alternatives for utility operations. The primary objective of this scoping study is the assessment of the financial and societal costs of implementing security measures in utility operations. Financial costs include the costs for developing security policies and implementing security countermeasure technologies. Societal costs include the impact of security policies and technologies on the efficiency of personnel and systems.

A second objective of this scoping study is twofold: (a) to assess whether or not the Internet can provide adequate security for the different utility control center functions, including power operations and market operations, and (b) are there viable alternatives to the Internet for this purpose. This assessment would include determining what alternative communication means are possible and what the impact would be to move functions using the Internet to using these alternative communications methods. As a part of this assessment, the communication security needs of different functions would be addressed, along with possible alternative communications methods, such as privately owned media, private access to media owned by telecommunications providers, and secure access to more public media.

EPRI Report - Security Enhancements for Utility Information Architectures

Xanthus staff assessed the “end-to-end” security requirements for utility operations, addressing not only information security measures (such as encryption of protocols), but also security policy requirements for meeting overall security. Xanthus staff focused on the key security concerns in utility operations (illustrated below for the exchange of information using ICCP):

 

Priority

 

Security Concerns

Non-Secure ICCP Profile

Entire Set of Secure ICCP Profile when Security Recommendations have been Implemented

1

Bypassing Controls

Bypassing Controls

2

Integrity Violation

Indiscretion

3

Authorization Violation

Illegitimate Use

4

Indiscretion

Information Leakage

5

Intercept/Alter

Availability (e.g. Prevention of Denial of Service)

6

Illegitimate Use

Data Validity

7

Information Leakage

Performance

8

Spoof

Local Security Administration and Procedures

9

Masquerade

Remote Security Procedures

10

Availability (e.g. Prevention of Denial of Service)

Certificate and Authentication Management

11

Eavesdropping (e.g. Data Confidentiality)

Certificate Authority Privacy and Security Procedures

Xanthus staff also assessed the impacts on performance of possible security measures (encryption, IPSec, SSL/TLS, and other security technologies) for remote digital control. Specifically, Xanthus staff evaluated the impacts of adding security on ICCP, UCA, and DNP.

T&D Primer and Security Issues for EPRI EIS Program

Xanthus staff developed a “Security Primer on Transmission and Distribution Operational Systems”, and presented this primer at an EPRI EIS Workshop to raise the awareness of utilities as to the real threat of cyber security attacks on power system operations.